Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
The Shameful Menshevik-Narodnik Bloc with Yedinstvo
Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1964, Moscow, Volume 24, pages 531-532.
Today is the second and principal day of the elections, The most importunate in offering themselves to the electorate, besides the Cadets, are the united Mensheviks and Narodniks.
What answer did they have to our accusation concerning their shameful bloc with Yedinstvo? Are they prepared to defend this bloc on grounds of principle?
They are not.
In reply to our suggestion that the bloc with Yedinstvo was a disgrace, Rabochaya Gazeta quotes the example ofâwhom would you think?âof the agent provocateur Malinovsky and of his being smuggled into the Duma by the secret police!
The dishonesty of such a âmethodâ of controversy is dealt with elsewhere [in this edition] in a separate paragraph.[1] Here we are concerned with âRabochaya Gazetaâsâ logic rather than its dishonesty. Look what you do, gentlemen! You parry our reference to âyourâ Yedinstvo by a counter-reference to âourâ agent provocateur Malinovsky! What is the inference? The inference is that you consider Yedinstvo on a par with an agent provocateur!
That is how the wise heads of Rabochaya Gazeta âdefendâ the bloc with Yedinstvo. Very clever of them, to be sure. When told that they have in free Russia such a disgraceful colleague as Plekhanovâs Yedinstvo, they answer: And the Bolsheviks, in tsarist Russia, had the agent provocateur Malinovsky! Isnât this a gem of a defence?
Dyelo Naroda, too, has put its toot into it in regard to Yedinstvo. On May 27, the first day of the elections, this paper of Kerensky, Chernov and Co. carried a front-page appeal to vote for the lists in which âYedinstvoâ is smuggled in.
And on the second page of the same issue of Dyelo Naroda we read a lengthy denunciation of the âsocial-patriotâ Plekhanov and his Yedinstvo, containing, among others, the following âvitriolic remarkâ:
âWe will gladly inform our readers what other liberal- and social-imperialistââRechâ, âRusskaya Volyaâ and âYedinsstvoââthink about the Italian annexation [of Albania].â
A gem, is it not?
The âSocialist-Revolutionariesâ call on the people to vote for lists in which the candidates of Yedinstvo are concealed, the very same âYedinstvoâ which the Socialist-Revolutionaries themselves, and on election day at that, call âsocial imperialistâ, i.e., socialist in word and âimperialist in deedâ, the very same Yedinstvo which they identify with Rech and Russkaya Volya.
The wise Rabochaya Gazeta, in a bloc with the wise Dyelo Naroda, has certainly âdefendedâ Yedinstvo today.
And Plekhanov accepts alms from people who âaccidentallyâ compare him with Malinovsky, or, on election day, openly declare him to be a âsocial-imperialistâ.
Such is the exhibition which this disgraceful bloc of the Mensheviks plus Narodniks plus Yedinstvo is making of itself.
Workers and soldiers! All toiling people! Not a single vote to the Narodniks and Mensheviks, who are trying to drag in the âsocial-imperialistsâ!
Vote for the Bolsheviks!
- â [PLACEHOLDER.] âLenin