Max Verworn. The Hypothesis of Biogenesis. Jena, 1903

Add a subpage to this text

Read the help page for usage.

Create or edit

 

MAX VERWORN.

THE HYPOTHESIS OF BIOGENESIS

JENA, 1903

	(Med. 5218)
The author expounds a special theme concerning “living substance” and its chem- ical metabolism. A special theme.	cf. p. 9definition of “Enzyme”

A bibliography is provided on this question. P. 112—a “working hypothesis,” this, he says, is the essence. For example, he says that materialism in the nineteenth century was of great benefit to the natural sciences,—but now “no philosophical nat- ural scientist any longer considers the ma- terialist conception to be adequate” (112). There are no eternal truths. The signifi- cance of ideas, their Fruchtbarkeit, their role as a “ferment”—“which creates and acts.” (113) |Characteristic here is the naïve ex- pression of the view that “materialism” hinders! Not the haziest conception of dialectical materialism and complete inability to distinguish materialism as a philosophy from the individ- ual hide-bound views of the philistines of the day who call themselves mate- rialists|. The aim of the author is a “mechanical analysis of the phenomena of life” (p. 1, Preface)—a reference to the last chapter of the Allegemeine Physiologie. Instead of “living protein” (p. 25)— said to be an unclear concept, and instead of the “living protein molecule” (“since a molecule cannot be alive”), the author proposes to speak of the “biogen-molecule.” (25) The conversion of the chemical into the living—that, evidently, is the crux. In order to move more freely in this new, still obscure, hypothetical, down with “material- ism,” down with antiquated shackl- ing” ideas (the “molecule”), let us invent a new term (biogen), in order to seek new knowledge more freely! NB. Concerning the ques- tion of the sources and vital im- pelling motives of modern “ideal- ism” in physics and natural science in general.