Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to Georgi Plekhanov, July 13, 1901
Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1971, Moscow, Volume 36, pages 89-90
July 13, 1904
I have received your letter of the 11th. As regards Orthodoxâs P. Scriptum,[1] the majority opinion is being set forth to you today by Alexei. I disagree with this opinion, and I (personally) would like to know your view, both of this P.S. in particular, and of the opinion likewise that it could supposedly be rejected after the adoption of the whole article, owing to the âliterary defectsâ in the P. Scriptum. The ârescueâ of the P.S., about which you write, may be possible if there is a resolute vote by Pavel Borisovich for, and even then not for certain: the votes will be equally divided, for Alexei is now almost entirely against.
Generally speaking, I think that on any matter in any way relating to âcontroversialâ points, you ought to make a direct inquiry about the reasons for the opinions expressed by our Struvefreundliche[2]: this could be done by letters addressed to Lehmann as before (altogether, letters should now be addressed through to Lehmann) with an addition âfĂźr Meyerâ and âfor Puttmanâ Iâm afraid I simply cannot undertake to give an account of their views. This applies also, for instance, to my article against R. N. S.[3]
Many thanks for the offer to send material against Chernov. I have just got on to him, and could probably find use for what bears on France and Belgium (Vandervelde et DestrĂŠe, Le socialisme en Belgique,[4] quoted by Chernov, and also Vanderveldeâs latest work[5]). But send it only if you donât need it, and if you can do without it for a few weeks. I very much need to have Liebknechtâs Zur Grundund Bodenfrage,[6] which I have failed to find here, either among Parvusâs books or at the library. If you do have it, please send it along for a short time.
Chernov quotes someone called Gerolamo Gatti, who is a downright opponent of the Marxists: Le nuove correnti dellâeconomia agricola (Milano-Palermo, 1900).[7] Do you know what sort of bird this is? Is he worth reading? Is there a French translation? (I donât know Italian, though perhaps my sister could help.)
Very best wishes. Write about my article.
Yours,
Petrov
- â P. Scriptum to Orthodoxâs article was written by the author, L. I. Axelrod, for her article âWhy Donât We Want to Go Back?â, on N. A. Berdayevâs article âStruggle for Idealismâ, which appeared in the magazine Mir Bozhy (Godâs World) No. 6, June 1901. The latter, a liberal, later became a reactionary.
Lenin and G. V. Plekhanov insisted on the publication of P. Scriptum, but on a majority decision of the Board (Y. O. Martov, V. I. Zasulich and A. N. Potresov) the article was published without P. Scriptum in Zarya No. 2â3, December 1901. - â Members of Iskraâs Editorial Board nicknamed A. N. Potresov and V. I. Zasulich the âStruvefreundliche Parteiâ (Party friendly to Struve).
- â A reference to Leninâs article âThe Persecutors of the Zemstvo and the Hannibals of Liberalismâ (see present edition, Vol. 5, pp. 31â80).
- â Socialism in Belgium.âEd.
- â E. Vandervelde, La propriĂŠtĂŠ foncière en Belgique (Land Property in Belgium), Paris, 1900.
- â On the Agrarian Question.âEd.
- â Gerolamo Gatti, Agricoltura e socialismo. Le nuove correnti dellâeconomia agricola (The Agrarian Question and Socialism. New Trends in Agriculture).âEd.