Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to Albert Goldman, August 9, 1940
First Published: Fourth International, Vol.1 No.5, October 1940, p.126.
Reprinted: In Defense of Marxism, New York 1942.
Checked against: In Defence of Marxism, London 1966, pp.229-230.
This letter is a part of a series of letters published in this issue of Fourth International under the heading of Trotskyâs Last Letters.
August 9, 1940
Albert Goldman
Dear Friend:
I donât know whether you have seen Dwight Macdonaldâs article in the August issue of his Partisan Review.
This man was a disciple of Burnham, the intellectual snob. After Burnham deserted, Dwight Macdonald was left in Shachtmanâs party as the lone representative of âScienceâ.
On the question of fascism, Macdonald serves up a poor compilation of plagiarisms from our arsenal which he represents as his own discoveries and to which he opposes some banalities that he characterizes as our ideas. The whole-without perspective, without proportion and without elementary intellectual honesty.
However, this is not the worst. Burnhamâs orphan proclaims: âWe must examine again with a cold and skeptical eye, the most basic premises of Marxism.â (Page 266) And what must the poor âWorkers Partyâ do during this period of examination? What must the proletariat do? They should wait of course, for the result of Dwight Macdonaldâs study. This result will probably be Macdonaldâs desertion himself into the camp of Burnham.
The last four lines of the article can be nothing but preparation for personal desertion. âOnly if we meet the stormy and terrible years ahead with both skepticism and devotion â skepticism towards all theories, governments and social systems; devotion to the revolutionary fight of the masses â only then can we justify ourselves as intellectuals.â
Revolutionary activity based upon theoretical skepticism is the most awkward of inner contradictions. âDevotion to the revolutionary fight of the massesâ is impossible without theoretical understanding of the laws of this revolutionary fight. Revolutionary devotion is possible only if one gains the assurance that his devotion is reasonable, adequate; that it corresponds to its aim. Such assurance can be created only by theoretical insight into the class struggle. â Skepticism towards all theoriesâ is nothing but preparation for personal desertion.
Shachtman remains silent; as âGeneral Secretaryâ he is too busy to defend the âmost basic premises of Marxismâ from petty bourgeois philistines and snobs ...
Fraternally yours,
L. TROTSKY