Mathematical Manuscripts (1881)

From Marxists-en
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This text is not available, or incomplete, please help if you can !

Table of Contents[edit source]

The Manuscripts[edit source]

Two Manuscripts on Differential Calculus[edit source]

‘On the Concept of the Derived Function’
On the Differential

On the history of Differential Calculus[edit source]

First Draft
Second Draft

On the history of Differential Calculus[1][edit source]

Third Draft
Some Supplements
First Drafts
Continuation of Extracts

Taylor's Theorem, MacLaurin's Theorem and Lagrange's Theory of Derived Functions[edit source]

1. From the Manuscript ‘Taylor's Theorem, MacLaurin's Theorem, and Lagrange's Theory of Derived Functions’
2. From the Unfinished Manuscript ‘Taylor's Theorem’

Appendices to the Manuscript ‘On the History of the Differential Calculus’ and Analysis of D’Alembert's Method[edit source]

On the Ambiguity of the Terms ‘Limit’ and ‘Limit Value’
Comparison of D’Alembert's Method to the Algebraic Method
Analysis of D’Alembert's Method by Means of Yet Another Example

Hegel on Calculus[edit source]

The Differential
Calculus Deduced from its Application
Infinitesimal Magnitudes

Hegel & Mathematics, Ernst Kolman & Sonya Yanovskaya

Letters of Marx and Engels on Science and Mathematics.

PDF version of the entire New Park Publications book[edit source]

This file has been copied from The Maoist Internationalist Movment website. It is a photocopy of the same New Park book used for the above texts, but includes the full text, including indexes, preface, etc., in a single, large file.

PDF version

Hegel, Marx and the Calculus, Cyril Smith | Review of the New Park Publications Edition, Andy Blunden, June 1983.

  1. ↑ With his manuscript ‘On the Differential’, Marx fulfilled a promise to write a specialized piece shedding light on the historical path of the development of differential calculus. In sketches preceding this letter [‘On the Differential’ was a letter to Engels - Trans], he expressed an intention to illustrate the history of differential calculus by means of the history of the theorem on the differential of a product. Obviously Marx succeed in carrying out neither of these intentions completely. Only the tentative drafts contained in the notebook ‘B (continuation of A)’, where they alternate with Marx’s computations for his work on the differential, have survived. These drafts begin, appropriately for Marx’s primary purpose, with an explanation of the methods of Newton and Leibnitz in the example of the theorem on the differential of a product. For the same reason, only the beginning goes like this and not the concluding section explication the method of d’Alembert. Later Marx passes to a more detailed discussion and critique of the methods of Newton and Leibnitz in general. This brings him to the general periodisation of the history of differential calculus, in which three periods are distinguished: 1) the mystical differential calculus of Newton and Leibnitz, 2) the rational differential calculus of d’Alembert, and 3) the purely algebraic differential calculus of Lagrange, the characterisation of which comprises the second part of the extant drafts of the history of differential calculus. It was this part which Marx apparently decided to develop into a third letter to Engels. The concluding part of the historical drafts presents a more detailed exposition of the general ideas contained in the first part. The drafts are published in full with the exception of notes whose content refers to the work ‘On the Differential’, which are omitted.