Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to Nikolai Bukharin, October 11, 1920
Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1975, Moscow, Volume 44, page 445a.
By a decision of the Politbureau of the CC, RCP(b) on October 11, 1920, N. I. Bukharin was directed to speak at a meeting of the Communist, group at the First All-Russia Congress of Proletcult, which was held in Moscow from October 5 to 12, 1920. The document published hero was Leninâs reply to a note from Bukharin, who announced his refusal to speak at the Congress on the grounds that disagreements between him and Lenin were possible on certain questions of proletarian culture, for example, on point 4 of Leninâs draft resolution âOn Proletarian Cultureâ (see present edition, Vol. 31, pp. 316â17). The Communist group at the First Congress of Proletcult was proposed to adopt an organisational resolution subordinating the central and local Proletcult organisations to the Peopleâs Commissariat for Education. This resolution was drawn up on the lines of Leninâs express directives and was unanimously adopted by the Proletcult Congress.
Why now dwell on the differences between us ( perhaps possible ones), if it suffices to state (and prove) on behalf of the Central Committee as a whole:
(1) proletarian culture=communism
(2) is carried out by the RCP
(3) the proletar.-class=RCP=Soviet power.
We are all agreed on this, arenât we?