Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to M. A. Savelyev, February 22, 1913
Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1976, Moscow, Volume 35, pages 88-89
For Vetrov
Urgent
Dear Colleague,
It is extremely sad that our correspondence is still not properly organised, that I still have no special address for you personally, that yon donât reply to my questions for so long. (1) I wrote to you a very, very long time ago that Zvezda still had, in addition to the article âDebates in Britain on Liberal Labour Policyâ, the articles âTwo Utopiasâ[1] and a criticism of the boycott policy (against Amfiteatrov, I donât remember the title[2]). I repeat what I asked: get hold of them and send them to me. I hope to make use of them. (2) At Pravda there are also a number of articles which have not been used there. I very much want, you to find them and make them into notes of a publicist signed, say, T.... The approximate arrangement would be: I. Reply to Mayevsky (in Luch, about liquidationism). (This subject is the more necessary because Dnevnitsky and Plekhanov, in No. 234 of Pravda, have struck false notes.) II. Bulgakov in Russkaya Mysl on the peasants (I donât remember the title). III. On morality (two short articles). IV. âAn Increasing Discrepancyâ (on the February 1913 conference of the Cadets. We must react to this. Two short articles were sent to Pravda the day before yesterday; the remaning four are small, I am sending them today). The titles for these paragraphs should not be in large type (as was clone in the article âResults of the Electionsâ[3] in No. 1 of Prosveshcheniye) but in small point.
There are an awful lot of misprints in No. 1 of Prosveshcheniye.... I enclose the corrected proofs of the article âDebates in Britain on Liberal Labour Policyâ. It should be printed. Have yon really not managed to get rid yet of Mikhalchi.... This is essential, I assure you, essential. I have seen a misprint on page 26 of Prosveshcheniye No. 1. A correction in print is absolutely necessary. I enclose the correction.
V. Il.
Misprint
Many misprints occurred in the January number of Prosveshcheniye (1913, No. 1). We correct one which distorts the sense. On page 26, line 23 from the top, it reads: â25 per cent in the workersâ partyâ, but should read â52 per centâ.