Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to Lev Kamenev, August 2, 1911
Published: First published in 1964 in Collected Works, Fifth (Russian) Ed., Vol. 48. Printed from the original.
Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1977, Moscow, Volume 43, pages 279b-280a.
Dear L. B.,
I am sending you the proof-sheets.[1]
In § âTwo Partiesâ (especially in the end, page 86 in fine[2] âsee separate sheet) changes are necessary. (1) We must not call for a break with the conciliators. This is quite uncalled for and incorrect. A âpersuasiveâ tone should be adopted towards them, by no means should they be antagonised. (2) The split should be discussed with more tact, always choosing formulations to the effect that the liquidators have broken away, created and proclaimed a âcomplete breakâ, and that the Party ought not to tolerate them (âand the conciliators ought not to confuse issuesâ), and so on.
Thatâs how you put it mostly. But not always. Look through § âTwo Partiesâ once again.
We shall tone down the reply to the Germans. You are right in saying it sounds rather sharp.
Do not fail to send in the proofs of the § on the conciliators.
All the best,
Yours,
Lenin