Letter to Inessa Armand, November 7, 1916

Add a subpage to this text

Read the help page for usage.

 

Dear Friend,

Instead of “imperialist economism”, you write that, you don’t understand the expression “economic imperialism”.

The old “economism” wrongly posed the question of the attitude of capitalism to the political struggle.

The new “economism” wrongly poses the question of the attitude of capitalist imperialism to the political struggle.

I am writing about this at greater length in my article against Yuri (this “merchant” has “consented” to being published—that means, he will go into Sbornik No. 3 or No. 4).

The differences with Radek are of more than mere theoretical interest for Russia (as well as for Germany, Britain, for countries with colonies). For Switzerland—yes.

Grimm is an insolent beggar and a swine: he meanly attacks, not me (as Grigory mistakenly believes, being poorly informed by Zina), but Radek. It was like this (entre nous): Friday evening we arranged a meeting of the Lefts (where Radek and I acted fully in concert) and adopted. (setting up a committee) a resolution on Kienthal. It was attended by Platten, Nobs, Münzenberg and some others, i.e., all the leaders of the Lefts. On Saturday afternoon, when the congress was on (it started Saturday morning), a meeting of the “Young” (and also congress delegates) was held outside the congress premises. Münzenberg was in the chair. The report on (our) resolution was made by Radek. I did not speak. The resolution was adopted. To this meeting (the door not being locked!) some ladies came uninvited—(Genossin Block (Bloch), a lady friend of Grimm’s and a gossip), Dimka (another gossip and a lady friend of Martov’s) and others. Obviously, they “reported back” to Grimm. And Grimm decided (believing this old wives’ silly tittle-tattle) that the “actual mover”=Radek, and wrote in the press that this mover (Urheber) spoke “Vor einem anderen Forum”. Kharitonov is publishing a refutation in Volksrecht.

I carried on strong agitation with Platten and Nobs for organising (or rather, rallying) the Lefts. I am making a report to them on this (Platten has promised to arrange it). I wonder whether I’ll cope with the language and whether anything will come of it.

Radek has promised to come out directly against Grimm in Arbeiterpolitik (I advise you to subscribe to this weekly journal, it costs 15 pfg.=20 cent.).

We’ll see whether he does!

Keep well.

(It was me who wrote the article in the CO. )

All the best,

Lenin

P.S. I sent, my “theses” to Berne for you (to Grigory’s address) asking you to translate them into French (for Geneva, Lausanne, La Chaux-de-Fonds, etc.). Did you receive them? What’s your opinion of them?