Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to Inessa Armand, November 20, 1916
Published: First published in 1949 in Bolshevik No. 1. Sent from Zurich to SĂśrenberg (Switzerland). Printed from the original.
Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1976, Moscow, Volume 35, pages 246-247.
Dear Friend,
Of course, I also want to correspond. Letâs continue our correspondence.
How I laughed over your postcard, I really had to hold my sides, as they say. âIn France there is no such measure as the ha, but there is the acre, and you donât know how big an acre is....â
That really is funny!
It was Franceâimaginez-vous?âthat introduced the metric system. According to the metric system, adopted in most countries of the world, a ha=hectare=100 acres. An acre is not a French measure but an English one, about 4/10 of a hectare.
You mustnât be offended over my laughing. I didnât mean any harm. After all, is it so surprising that you do not often come across the words hectare, ha, etc.? They are dull, technical words.
Many thanks for translating the theses.[1] I will send them to Abramovich and Guilbeaux.
Alter them for France? Itâs hardly worth the while, much is different there.
Today there was a meeting of the Lefts here: not everyone came, only 2 Swiss + 2 foreigners (Germans) + 3 Russ. Jew. Polish[2] ... Schwach! I think it will be almost a failure: the second meeting will be in ten daysâ time.... Itâs difficult for them, because what it actually amounts to is a war with Grimm, and their forces are too small. Well, weâll see.
As regards women, I agree with your addendum.
You are being captious about the thesis that Social-Democrats (1) in Switzerland (2) now should not vote in any circumstances for war credits. After all, the beginning goes on all the time about the present, imperialist war. Nothing else but that.
âThe working men have no countryââthis means that (Îą) his economic position (le salariat[3] ) is not national but international, (β) his class enemy is international, (Îł) the conditions of his emancipation also, (δ) the international unity of the workers is more important than the national.
Does this mean, does it follow from this, that we should not light when it is a question of throwing off a foreign yoke?? Yes or no?
A war of colonies for emancipation?
âof Ireland against England?
And an insurrection (national), is not that defence of the fatherland?
I will send you my article against Kievsky about this.[4]
If you need more books, write. One can get a lot here, and all the same I am often in the libraries.
All the best.
Lenin
- â Inessa Armand had translated into French the theses known as âTasks of the Left Zimmerwaldists in the Swiss Social-Democratic Partyâ (see present edition, Vol. 23, pp. 137â48).
- â And the lecture did not come off, only a talk. âLenin
- â Wages system.âEd.
- â See âA Caricature of Marxism and Imperialist Economismâ (present edition, Vol. 23, pp. 28â76).âEd.