Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to Anatoly Lunacharsky, August 1, 1905
Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 1977, Moscow, Volume 43, pages 161b-162a.
Dear An. V.,
I am sending you a new pamphlet by Plekhanov. How petty are his sallies and âdigsâ at the Machists! For me this is all the more disappointing since essentially Plekhanovâs criticism of Mach is, I believe, correct.
I am thinking of writing a short article entitled âG. Plekhanovâs Latest Contributionâ.[1]
Prepare the introduction to your pamphlet Sketches on the History of the Revolutionary Struggle of the West-European Proletariat.[2] We shall put out a special one about the February revolution.[3]
We have CC letters from Russia looking forward to writings by you.[4] It is very difficult for us without your regular, close collaboration. The paper, true, comes out, but it is somewhat monotonous as well. Thatâs one thing. Secondly, there are no pamphlets, especially popular ones. You ought to continue in the vein of How the Petersburg Workers Went To Petition the Tsar.
My pamphlet will come out this week.[5] I shall send it to you.
The Congress minutes will probably come out in August.
Vas. Vas. is swamped with routine work and does not write, which is a great pity.
Best regards,
Yours,
Lenin
- â A reference to the second edition of Frederick Engelsâs Ludwig Feuerbach translated by G. V. Plekhanov and with an introduction by him. Lenin never wrote the article in which he proposed to comment on Plekhanovâs introduction. For Leninâs criticism of some of the propositions advanced by Plekhanov, see Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (present edition, Vol. 14, pp. 151â53).
- â Sketches on the History of the Revolutionary Struggle of the European Proletariat were printed in Vperyod and Proletary and later published in pamphlet form in Geneva with an afterword by the author.
- â A. V. Lunacharskyâs article âThe February Revolution and Its Consequencesâ, dealing with the events of 1848, was printed in Proletary No. 20, October 10 (September 27), 1905.
- â A reference to a letter dated May 26, 1905, from D. S. Postolovsky, a member of the CC, RSDLP, in which he wrote: âIt would be most desirable fur Voinov to write, under your guidance, at least once a week a political leaflet which could be sent in manuscript form to the organisations for printing.â
- â A reference to Two Tactics of Social-Democracy in the Democratic Revolution (see present edition, Vol. 9, pp. 15â140).âEd.