Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
Letter to A. Ekk, February 23, 1910
23/II. 10
Dear Comrade,
I have read your letter. I recall our joint work in London. I recall that at that time (or a little later) I heard with one ear about the commission on your case.[1]
That such an affair should drag out for nearly three years is in my opinion really outrageous, and I quite appreciate your indignation. What is to be done? As far as I can judge, it is necessary to apply officially to the CC of the RSDLP and specifically to its organ abroad, the Bureau Abroad of the CC (address the same; insideâfor the Bureau Abroad of the CC, RSDLP). I think the best thing would be for me to forward your letter to them. If you agree, I can do it.
If you would like first to try to push the matter through members of the Chief Executive, you had best apply to Yuzef (for you do not suspect him of any partiality). And that should be done at once. Send him a letter (by registered post) addressed both to the Chief Executive and to the Polish Social-Democrat member of the Editorial Board of the Central Organ (also care of Kotlyarenko; inside: for member of the Editorial Board of the CO from the P.S.D.). If this is done quickly, I believe you ought to be able to get an answer and advice from Yuzef.
The permanent organ abroad of the CC, i.e., the CC Bureau Abroad, can (and should) put an end to the affair. The Russian CC would in my view be physically unable to do so. How the Polish Chief Executive could have dragged it out so long and disobeyed its own Congress is more than I can understand!
With S.D. greetings,
N. Lenin
- â A. Ekk (Mukhin) was accused of unseemly behaviour. The case was examined in 1909 by a special commission which found that there was âno grounds for bringing Ekk before a Party courtâ. Ekk was not informed of this decision; in reply to an inquiry ad dressed to F. E. Dzerzhinsky (Yuzef), he received an answer dated March 9, 1910, that the CC of the Party had âendorsed the decision of the commission as it stoodâ. Later, however, the Ekk case was reopened; the last commission was unable to complete the investigation in view of the outbreak of the First World War.