Letter to Adolph Joffe, July 1, 1918

From Marxists-en
Revision as of 22:11, 17 May 2021 by Wikirouge (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 19([0-9]{2}), Moscow, Volume ([0-9]{1,2})," to "Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, 19$1, Moscow, Volume $2,")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1. VII. 1918

Dear Comrade Joffe,

I am, to tell the truth, extremely angry with you. We are short-handed, everyone is devilishly overworked, yet you go and do a thing like this: you write a lot on business matters in a personal letter to me (the last one, in pencil) and insert a number of personal thrusts, attacks, pinpricks and so on against Chicherin (“not a real” m-r[1] and so on). To Chicherin, on the other hand, you write: “prospects in the letter to Lenin”.

Damn it, it’s the frozen limit!

Chicherin, naturally, asks me for the letter, and I can’t show it, because I don’t want to be an instrument of squabble. The result is that the work suffers and relations suffer.

Chicherin is a splendid worker, most conscientious, shrewd, knowledgeable. Such people should be highly appreciated. That his failing is lack of “commandership” does not matter. There are plenty of people in this world who have the opposite failing!

Chicherin is a man you can work with, he is easy to work with, but the work can be spoiled even with him.

You find fault with him, but the Commissariat for Foreign Affairs has a right to complain of you, too, because you do not reckon with him, and without the knowledge and permission of the People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs, ambassadors are not, of course, entitled to take decisive steps.

I hope you will take all measures to eliminate these Mißstände.[2]

That you have got Krasin “on the move” is very good. Keep on at Shklovsky with all your might; he is a lazybones; demand reports and more reports, use threats.

All the best,

Lenin

  1. ↑ Apparently “minister”.— Ed.
  2. ↑ Shortcomings.—Ed.