Category | Template | Form |
---|---|---|
Text | Text | Text |
Author | Author | Author |
Collection | Collection | Collection |
Keywords | Keywords | Keywords |
Subpage | Subpage | Subpage |
Template | Form |
---|---|
BrowseTexts | BrowseTexts |
BrowseAuthors | BrowseAuthors |
BrowseLetters | BrowseLetters |
Template:GalleryAuthorsPreviewSmall
Special pages :
On the Political Action of the Working Class. Plan for speech
Author(s) | Frederick Engels |
---|---|
Written | 20 September 1871 |
First published, in French, in the magazine Cahiers du Bolchévisme. Revue bimensuelle publiée par le C.C. du Parti communiste français (S.F.I.C.), No. 20, 1934
Printed according to the manuscript
Published in English for the first time in Marx-Engels Collected Works, Volume 22
The question of the political action of the working class, which was the main issue on the agenda of the London Conference and was comprehensively analysed in the speeches by Marx and Engels, was discussed at the sixth and seventh sessions of the Conference on September 20 and 21. The Bakuninists Bastelica and Robin, as well as Lorenzo, the representative of the Spanish sections, tried to have this question taken off the agenda declaring that the Conference was incompetent to discuss it. By a majority vote, the Conference instructed the General Council to prepare the final text of the resolution taking all motions into account (see this volume, pp. 426-27). In addition to this plan of Engelsâ speech on the political action of the working class, written in German, there is his record of this speech in French, which was appended to the minutes of the Conference on September 21 (pp. 417-18). This speech has also survived as a brief record in the minutes.
[PLAN FOR SPEECH AT THE CONFERENCE SESSION ON SEPTEMBER 21, 1871]
1) Lorenzo matter of principleâthis decided.
2) Abstention impossible. Newspaper politics is also politics; all abstaining papers attack the government. The only question is how and how far to get involved in politics. This depends on circumstances and cannot be prescribed.
2) Abstention nonsensical; one should abstain because bad people might be electedâso no contributions because the treasurer might abscond. So, no newspaper because the editor is just as likely to sell himself as the deputy.
3) Political freedomsâparticularly of association, assembly and pressâour means of agitation; is it unimportant whether these are taken from us or not? And should we not resist if they are attacked?
4) Abstention preached, because otherwise one is recognising the status quo. The status quo exists and se fiche pasmal[1] about our recognition. If we use the means offered us by the status quo to protest against the status quo, is that . recognition?[2]
3) Abstention impossible.[3] The Workersâ Party as a political party exists and wants to act politically, and to preach abstention to it is to ruin the International. The mere contemplation of conditions, of political suppression for social ends forces the workers into politics; the preachers of abstention are driving them into the arms of bourgeois politicians. After the Commune, which put the political action of the workers on the agenda, abstention impossible.
4) We want the abolition of classes. Sole means is political power in the hands of the proletariatâand we should not go into politics? All abstentionists call themselves revolutionaries. Revolution is the highest act of politics, and anyone who wants it must also want the means of preparing revolution, educate the workers for it, and see to it that he is not cheated again by Favre and Pyat the following day. It is purely a question of which politicsâthe exclusively proletarian, not as the tail of the bourgeoisie.